|
POOR CHILDREN STILL NEED COURT PROTECTION
NEW FORMULA BRINGS BACK UNEQUAL FUNDING, SCRAPS ACCOUNTABILITY
Newark, NJ May 1, 2008
Education Law Center (ELC) filed papers on Wednesday with
the NJ Supreme Court opposing the State's request to stop
providing extra help for poor children and schools, as ordered
in the landmark Abbott v. Burke litigation.
ELC represents over 300,000 children in 31 poor, urban school
districts across the state. Abbott was filed on their
behalf seeking educational justice after decades of funding
inequality and neglect in these districts.
In several groundbreaking rulings since 1998, the Supreme
Court ordered the State to provide additional funding and
to target that funding to programs and reforms, such as preschool
and intensive literacy supports, designed to improve education
quality and performance. Known as the "Abbott remedies,"
the Court's rulings are recognized as the most important for
poor and minority schoolchildren since Brown v. Board of
Education over 50 years ago.
ELC in its filing cites the lack of any study, research or
data from the State to show that poor children no longer need
the extra funding, or that the Abbott remedies are
not working. ELC, on its part, presents the Court with detailed
data showing solid educational gains in the urban schools,
especially in preschool and early grades.
ELC also shows that the new funding formula - the School
Funding Reform Act of 2008 (SFRA) - which the State offers
as an alternative to the Abbott remedies, will significantly
reduce funding for poor children in the coming years. In addition,
the SFRA does not provide any funding earmarked for poor children
or require that any funding be spent on programs to address
their specific needs.
"The Supreme Court has ruled repeatedly that urban children
are entitled to equal and adequate school funding, and that
funding must reach the classroom for their benefit,"
said David Sciarra, ELC Executive Director and lead counsel
in Abbott. "The new formula is not new at all.
Sadly, it brings back unequal funding, with no accountability
for how school funding is spent."
ELC's filing included reports from prominent experts who
analyzed the flaws in the new formula. Several organizations,
including the Association for Children of New Jersey and the
Urban Mayors Association, along with a coalition of special
education advocates, filed amicus briefs in support
of ELC's position.
ELC is asking the court to deny the State's request or, in
the alternative, to send the request to a trial court for
a full hearing.
To read ELCs legal brief, click here.
Copyright © 2008 Education Law Center.
All Rights Reserved.
|