|
ELC ADVOCATES ON BEHALF OF CHILDREN WITH DISABILITIES IN NEWARK
ELC, along with the Center for Social Justice
at Seton Hall University School of Law and the Gibbons Fellowship
in Public Interest and Constitutional Law at Gibbons, Del
Deo, Dolan, Griffinger & Vecchione, P.C., is advocating
on behalf of children with disabilities in Newark who have
been denied appropriate special education services.
The case of M.A. v. Newark Public Schools,
which was filed in 2001 on behalf of six children
with disabilities, their parents and all other similarly situated
children in Newark, alleges that Newark Public Schools and
the State have routinely denied thousands of children with
disabilities a "free appropriate public education" and a "thorough
and efficient education" in violation of federal and state
special education laws, federal civil rights laws and the
New Jersey Constitution. Newark and the State have failed
to identify, locate, refer and evaluate thousands of children
with disabilities for special education eligibility, have
failed to provide them with appropriate special education
and related services, and have failed to provide them with
"compensatory education" to compensate for the educational
services which they did not receive. One plaintiff failed
or marginally passed classes for several years, yet was advanced
to the next grade level each year, while his mothers
requests for a special education evaluation were repeatedly
ignored. Another plaintiff with Attention Deficit Hyperactivity
Disorder and Myasthenia Gravis, was similarly not evaluated
despite numerous requests for evaluations by her parent. The
complaint also alleges that the State additionally failed
to appropriately monitor Newarks delivery of special
education services and failed to ensure that students with
disabilities received appropriate relief in response to complaint
investigation requests which are filed pursuant to the Individuals
with Disabilities Education Act.
The M.A. plaintiffs successfully defeated
multiple-count motions to dismiss in the district
court, attained a preliminary injunction on behalf
of two of the named plaintiffs (see "district court"
link above), and defeated the States appeal to the Third
Circuit Court of Appeals of both the preliminary injunction
and the denial of the motion to dismiss. In a strongly
worded decision, the Third Circuit found that
at least two of the named plaintiffs had "suffered from
years of neglect" and faced "the potential harm ... from continuing
failure to provide appropriate educational services." Subsequent
to the Third Circuit decision, the parties commenced settlement
discussions, and the parties are now amicably attempting to
resolve the lawsuit and establish appropriate mechanisms to
ensure that children with disabilities are no longer denied
their right to an appropriate education.
Anyone who is interested in further information
about this lawsuit, or who is aware of any problems related
to the provision of special education services in Newark,
the States monitoring of special education services
or the States complaint investigation process should
contact Ruth Lowenkron of ELC at 973-624-1815, Ex. 21 (voice)
or 973-624-4618 (TDD)
Prepared: June 9, 2006
Copyright © 2006 Education
Law Center. All Rights Reserved.
|