|
STATE URGED TO FREE-UP SCHOOL CONSTRUCTION FUNDS FOR ALL NEEDY DISTRICTS
ELC has responded to a proposed
amendment (N.J.S.A. 6A:26-3.7(j)) to DOEs
educational facilities regulations to support a mechanism
to remove barriers to full state school construction funding
for non-Abbott districts with critical facilities needs, especially
those districts in DFG A or B. The proposed amendment full
state funding to those districts that can demonstrate fiscal
hardship by either having a T & E budget equalized tax
rate of at least 130 percent of the State average or
having an equalized municipal tax rate above the State average.
While DOE is acknowledging that some non-Abbott
districts lack the local taxing capacity to raise the local
share for facilities projects, the DOE proposal:
- fails to offer any justification for
the criteria used to identify "lowwealth"
districts that would be eligible for full state funding;
and
- fails to explain how these districts
will have access to any state funding since the current
allocation is almost exhausted.
ELC is calling on the Commissioner to provide
the Legislature with a full review of all district needs,
and an analysis of the barriers to accessing state grant funding.
As the Legislature prepares to review the school construction
program, this review and analysis will provide a basis for
authorizing additional funding and changing the current grant
program allocations to ensure that needy districts can readily
access those funds.
Preliminary data shows that most of the non-Abbott
grant funding went to mid and higher wealth districts that
had the capacity to raise the local share, leaving inner suburban,
rural or other poorer districts unable to access funding beyond
basic health and safety needs. The second round of long range
planning that each district must complete by October 2005
will allow the DOE to develop a statewide "facility needs"
inventory. This should provide the DOE with a basis to set
priorities for projects based on need in order to ensure that
the new facilities funding is equitably distributed.
Prepared: May 19, 2005
|