|
MASSACHUSETTS
COURT RECOMMENDS PRESCHOOL FOR ALL AT-RISK 3- AND 4-YEAR OLDS
In
a ruling similar to New
Jersey's Abbott case, a Massachusetts judge, in
declaring that state's school funding system unconstitutional,
directed the Commonwealth to provide a free, public preschool
program for all low-income children, children with disabilities,
and children with limited English proficiency. In the April
26, 2004 decision in Hancock
v. Driscoll, Judge Margot Botsford not only recommended
revamping the K-12 school funding formula, but also specifically
directed the State to include a high quality preschool program
in its cost determination.
As
in Abbott, the court's preschool directive was based on extensive
evidence on the benefits of high quality preschool education
for children at risk of school failure. The court relied on
the testimony of Dr. Steve Barnett of the National Institute
for Early Education Research (NIEER)
at Rutgers, and several research studies demonstrating the
benefits of high quality preschool for at risk children. These
benefits, cited by the court, include improving children's
school readiness, socialization skills and school performance
and, in the long term, increased high school graduation rates
and college attendance, better employment and reduced crime.
The court also adopted Dr. Barnett's standards for high quality
preschool - prepared and well-paid teachers, small classes,
and high standards for learning and teaching.
The
court relied on evidence that children in four low-wealth
Massachusetts school districts start kindergarten far behind
their more affluent peers. As the court found, "the evidence
has demonstrated that if high quality preschool programs are
not provided, the Commonwealth will not be in a position to
fulfill its obligation to educate all the children …because
at least some of these children start out so far behind, a
situation exacerbated by the lack of adequate early childhood
education."
Plaintiffs'
attorney Michael Weisman considers the court's preschool ruling
one of the most significant and far-reaching remedies in the
case, and "absolutely correct" given the overwhelming evidence
of the importance of high quality preschool programs for children
at risk of school failure.
Starting
at 3, an initiative at Education Law Center supporting
efforts to establish the legal right to preschool education,
provided technical support on the preschool claim to Mr. Weisman
and his colleagues, and to advocates who supported the case.
Prepared:
April 29, 2004
|