|
FY04 SUPPLEMENTAL FUNDING RESTORED |
| District |
FY 2003-04 Estimated Supplemental Funding before Appeal 1
|
FY 2003-04 Adjustment after Appeal 4 |
FY
2003-04 Current Estimated Supplemental Funding |
|
|
|
PLEASANTVILLE CITY |
8,520,772 |
3,490,051 |
12,010,823 |
|
GARFIELD CITY |
772,649 |
n/a |
772,649 |
|
BURLINGTON CITY |
1,215,216 |
0 |
1,215,216 |
|
PEMBERTON TWP 2 |
3,261,646 |
4,800,000 |
8,061,646 |
|
CAMDEN CITY |
8,776,153 |
841,417 |
9,617,570 |
|
GLOUCESTER CITY |
4,266,645 |
434,000 |
4,700,645 |
|
BRIDGETON CITY 3 |
n/a |
n/a |
n/a |
|
MILLVILLE CITY |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
VINELAND CITY |
5,097,401 |
7,133,505 |
12,230,906 |
|
EAST ORANGE |
2,606,739 |
453,686 |
3,060,425 |
|
IRVINGTON TOWNSHIP |
0 |
595,118 |
595,118 |
|
NEWARK CITY |
109,186,765 |
44,418,965 |
153,605,730 |
|
CITY OF ORANGE TWP |
0 |
2,000,000 |
2,000,000 |
|
HARRISON TOWN |
0 |
162,759 |
162,759 |
| HOBOKEN CITY 3
|
n/a |
n/a |
n/a |
|
JERSEY CITY |
47,255,402 |
0 |
47,255,402 |
|
UNION CITY 3 |
n/a |
n/a |
n/a |
|
WEST NEW YORK TOWN 3 |
n/a |
n/a |
n/a |
|
TRENTON CITY |
24,595,891 |
2,700,000 |
27,295,891 |
|
NEW BRUNSWICK CITY |
0 |
17,385,991 |
17,385,991 |
|
PERTH AMBOY CITY 3 |
n/a |
n/a |
n/a |
|
ASBURY PARK CITY |
8,742,709 |
2,417,887 |
11,160,596 |
|
KEANSBURG BORO |
4,894,321 |
903,906 |
5,798,227 |
|
LONG BRANCH CITY |
7,184,993 |
n/a |
7,184,993 |
|
NEPTUNE TWP |
5,236,824 |
855,030 |
6,091,854 |
|
PASSAIC CITY |
4,084,092 |
1,171,368 |
5,255,460 |
|
PATERSON CITY |
15,993,270 |
4,066,316 |
20,059,586 |
|
ELIZABETH CITY |
7,413,285 |
0 |
7,413,285 |
|
PLAINFIELD CITY |
2,894,410 |
0 |
2,894,410 |
|
PHILLIPSBURG TOWN |
1,279,820 |
809,153 |
2,088,973 |
| TOTALS |
273,279,003 |
94,639,152 |
367,918,155 |
| |
| 1 Source:
NJDOE Budget Decisions of 8/27/03. |
| 2 Pemberton's
8/27/03 letter contained a $7 million miscalulation. The district's
supplemental funding was subsequently reduced by that amount. |
| 3 These
districts have not requested supplemental programs and funding.
|
| 4 Amounts
estimated through communication with districts and review of ALJ Decisions
as of 10/13/03. These adjustments are subject to change upon further
analysis. |
|