|

Editorial for Philadelphia Inquirer
March 2006
By Joan Ponessa, Education Law Center
(This editorial was submitted to the
Philadelphia Inquirer and published on April 6, 2006 in the
New Jersey Section.)
More than a year ago, the Schools Construction
Corporation announced it had used up $8.6 billion to renovate
and build public schools, leaving hundreds of planned projects
in limbo. A series of blistering reports from the Inspector
Generals office followed, and the press kept up the
heat. Newly elected Governor Jon Corzine got the message and
one of his first actions was the appointment of a Working
Group to address the problems. On March 15, 2006 the Working
Group issued their first report recommending improvements
in SCC operations leading toward continuation of the school
construction program.
Although the report is a major step toward
resolving the problems of mismanagement of the states
school building program, the next step will be the critical
piece. How will New Jersey continue to fund the program? And
when? Establishing a timeframe for restarting the program
is essential. There are over 100 stalled projects in Abbott
districts. The state has already spent hundreds of millions
of dollars on land and design work for these projects. There
are also 38 non-Abbott districts that have already passed
referenda based on a promise from the state to assist with
funding. That fund has now run dry. Many other districts need
to upgrade schools but cannot move forward without guaranteed
state support.
The state has a moral and legal responsibility
to renovate and build the needed schools for our students.
Delay is costing New Jersey taxpayers hundreds of millions
of dollars. Construction costs have been escalating about
7.5% per year by SCCs own account. This translates into
serious cost increases for the state and local districts.
As an example, a $50 million project in Camden, will cost
the state an additional $7 million by next year or $312,500
more for every month of delay. As the costs for non-Abbott
projects escalate, the original projections approved by local
citizens will not be enough to complete projects.
The long-term reforms highlighted in the
Working Groups report are significant steps toward reorganization
of the SCC and must be addressed quickly to prevent further
delay. However the Legislature reconstitutes the SCC, it must
operate by law as a new independent authority and be accountable
to the governor, legislators, and taxpayers with a professional,
competent board and chief executive officer who are subject
to the highest ethical standards.
Progress is already underway toward a transition
- a newly organized Board of Directors has been working to
strengthen operations and management, and new systems are
being developed to address cost control and forecasting. However,
much work remains to be done.
Hundreds of projects were undertaken piecemeal
by SCC without setting aside funds to complete them. Now,
projects must be prioritized for construction; realistic and
accurate budgets for each project must be established; and
funds must be allocated to support the project budget to completion.
Construction costs must be reliably established using accepted
industry guidelines, something that has not been done thus
far.
The Legislature must streamline the structure
for designing and constructing projects by requiring the new
authority to use the most cost effective delivery method,
including letting the district do the work itself; having
the authority do the work; or letting the district design
and the authority construct the project. Design/build and
other mechanisms should be encouraged.
Of particular note in the Working Groups
report is the acknowledgement that quality school buildings
are linked to the revitalization of communities and economic
growth. During the first few years of the program, the municipal
planning process was independent of school planning and siting.
The State must use school facilities dollars to leverage investments
in open space, recreation, housing and other community needs.
The Legislature should enact policies that encourage community
features in all projects, and "joint use" projects
combining housing, retail, day care and other facilities with
schools, as is done in California and other states.
In Abbott districts, full State control of
the building program has left out the end-users of the schools
urban educators, parents and leaders. We need policies
to ensure community involvement in every aspect of the planning
and construction.
The State Department of Education must ensure
that the schools built can deliver a rigorous, high quality
education for decades to come. Schools must be built using
quality materials and include energy-efficient systems to
save on maintenance and operations.
The school construction program is a once-in-generations
opportunity to rebuild our pre-K to 12 schools, and to improve
the health and economic competitiveness of our cities and
their metro regions. Our kids are depending on us to get the
program fixed and running again.
Joan Ponessa is the Director of Research
at the Education Law Center, Newark and is a member of the
Governors Citizens Advisory Panel to the Working Group
on School Construction. She resides in Moorestown.
Copyright © 2006 Education
Law Center. All Rights Reserved.
|